Access isn’t effective use
Clip · 1:16
Licenses and logins give people access. Getting employees to use AI well every day takes more than that.
Northeastern University · Custom Learning
Live, expert-led programs built around your team’s roles, challenges, and questions, and taught in the tools they already use.
For leaders, business teams, and technical staff
Sessions reflect your team’s roles, industry, and constraints, inside the tools they already use.
Learners work through real questions with colleagues and Northeastern experts, which is where the nuance comes out.
Ideas from training can become projects with Northeastern talent and applied AI teams. See how Bangor Savings Bank did it →
Durable AI Skills
Tool training is perishable. Features move with every update, and tools change when your organization adopts new ones. We build skills that last: the judgment and habits to use AI well in whatever tool comes next.
We teach them hands-on in the tools your team already has, whether that’s Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or a mix, built around your team’s roles and questions.
A few of the skills that carry over from one tool to the next:
Framing the task, the context, and the result you want is a skill that works in any AI tool.
Learners explore hallucinations and common risks, and how to recognize when a result needs a closer look before anyone relies on it.
Deciding which tasks to hand to AI, which to keep, and how to build AI into the way your team already works.
Information is cheap and ubiquitous, whether or not it’s correct. Experience applying it, exercising judgment, and reflecting on it is not. Our programs are built to give your team experience.
AI in Action
Zach Blattner and Berkeley Almand-Hunter talk through what helps AI learning stick, from role relevance and hands-on practice to giving people time to experiment and measuring adoption in ways that connect to real work. Three short clips, each under two minutes.
Clip · 1:16
Licenses and logins give people access. Getting employees to use AI well every day takes more than that.
Clip · 1:35
New habits take hold when employees have room to practice, test ideas, and build confidence with AI.
Clip · 1:30
Usage counts are only a starting point. This clip looks at how to connect AI adoption back to work outcomes.
Results
Finishing a course and opening an AI tool are easy to count. What matters more is whether people use AI effectively: work done faster, better-informed decisions, and fewer outputs that have to be redone.
Right after every course
Effective use takes time to show up in the work, so we measure what appears first: the quality of instruction, the skills learners gained, and whether they expect to work differently as a result.
Learner-reported, from 3,400+ post-course surveys across custom learning programs (71% response rate).
Two years in
A two-year initiative with Northeastern that combined workforce assessment and development with a data opportunity roadmap for high-impact AI projects.
Northeastern’s LEAP framework assessed learning culture, ecosystem, analytical architecture, and people, setting the direction for the program.
A program focused on data fluency and responsible, ethical AI use across the workforce.
Eight co-op students deployed across the bank on key technical needs and projects.
A recommendation engine developed with the Institute for Experiential AI to support customer conversations and marketing.
Maximizing Productivity with Generative AI
“Great job of breaking it down and progressing through examples- it was helpful to digest and then practice! I actually was able to solve a real problem I have been fighting with for months!”
Maximizing Productivity with Generative AI
“The examples for the exercises were very applicable to my job, and I realized tasks AI could assist with that I was not already utilizing it for.”
Maximizing Productivity with Generative AI
“Interactive and engaging with the ability to ‘practice’ on relevant projects to my work.”
Evaluating AI Opportunities
“Practical way to break down potential AI use cases that could benefit the organization.”
Identifying AI Use Cases
“Really helpful and practical framework which supported engaging conversations in the breakout rooms.”
Maximizing Productivity with Generative AI
“Applicable knowledge and skills that can be leveraged immediately.”
Maximizing Productivity with Generative AI
“Very engaging - leaving course with tangible skills that I can use right away and also with concepts that can be applied broadly.”
Use the arrows, swipe, or scroll to see more.
Most organizations need different training for different groups, so leaders, business teams, and technical staff each get training that fits their role and the work AI could help them take on. Start from an example pathway or build your own from 20 courses, customized around your priorities, industry, tools, and workforce.
For leaders and teams responsible for AI initiatives. 3 courses plus a custom program, about 5.5–6 hrs.
Outcome: a shortlist of AI initiatives assessed for value, feasibility, and risk, with a clear path to implementation.
For employees applying AI to everyday work. 2 courses, about 4–8 hrs.
Outcome: broader, more confident use of approved AI tools in real workflows, not just tool access.
Examples only. Courses and sequence are adjusted for every organization.
Most programs combine courses from different starting points. Filter by who you’re training or search any topic, skill, or role, then add courses to see your pathway take shape.
Showing all 20 courses
For leaders
1.5–2 hrs
Help leaders build shared AI fluency, understand opportunity areas, and make better decisions about adoption and investment.
“Providing tools to help leaders wrap their heads around using and implementing AI without much knowledge of the nuts and bolts.”
For leaders and project managers
4 hrs
Build a shared foundation in AI, then work through a facilitated session to start shaping your organization’s AI strategy.
For leaders
2 hrs
Bring leaders together to brainstorm where AI could address real business challenges, then refine the strongest ideas.
For leaders
2 hrs
Give teams a structured way to identify, evaluate, and prioritize AI opportunities tied to business value.
“It broke the process of analyzing an AI opportunity down into practical steps. It’s been difficult to know where to start.”
For leaders
2 hrs
Use Northeastern’s LEAP methodology to assess AI and analytics readiness, pinpoint skill gaps, and map development pathways by role.
For leaders, data teams, and project managers
2–12 hrs
Give leaders and product teams a working understanding of machine learning, how AI solutions are deployed, and the risks to plan for.
For leaders, business teams, data teams, and project managers
2 hrs
Help employees use generative AI tools more effectively, safely, and consistently in everyday workflows.
“It gave some basic and easily understandable steps to create useful AI prompts for my work. It was engaging, interactive, and gave us time to experiment.”
For business teams, data teams, and project managers
2–6 hrs
Use personalization, grounded workspaces, documents, spreadsheets, and lightweight automations more intentionally.
For leaders and data teams
2–12 hrs
Support teams responsible for deploying AI in ways that maximize positive impact, reduce risk, and address emerging regulations.
“The session forced us to think about considerations I hadn’t thought about previously, such as the need for an AI ethics committee and how AI can be governed appropriately.”
For data teams and technical staffTechnical
2–4 hrs
Give engineers and technically fluent teams a grounding in responsible AI: where bias enters the ML lifecycle and how to measure it.
Requires experience in AI engineering or research.
For leaders and data teams
4 hrs
Align leaders around the strategic and operational pillars needed to become a more data-driven organization.
“Good collaboration and an opportunity to have data discussions with bank peers.”
For leaders and data teams
4–8 hrs
Help data, risk, and compliance leaders put governance in place that protects data quality and meets compliance requirements.
For business teams, data teams, and project managers
4–6 hrs
Help functional teams ask stronger questions, interpret data, and use insights to drive business decisions.
“I found the content relevant to my role and am now better equipped to analyze and present data.”
For leaders, business teams, data teams, and project managers
4–12 hrs
Help anyone who presents data turn analysis into clear visual stories that move a specific audience to act.
For data teamsTechnical
8–12 hrs
Teach analysts to find, combine, and summarize warehouse data with SQL before it ever reaches their BI tools.
For data teams and technical staffTechnical
9–12 hrs
Build Python skills for cleaning, analyzing, and visualizing data, working hands-on with your own company data.
For data teamsTechnical
9–12 hrs
Build R skills for cleaning, analyzing, and visualizing data, working hands-on with your own company data.
For data teams and technical staffTechnical
9–12 hrs
Build technical capability in Python-based machine learning for predictive and prescriptive data modeling.
“Machine learning and analysis were taught in an approachable manner. It was useful to see practical examples.”
For technical staffTechnical
2 hrs
Support developers in using AI-assisted coding tools more effectively inside real engineering workflows.
For leaders, business teams, and project managers
4–12 hrs
Help project managers and team leads strengthen planning, communication, stakeholder management, risk management, and execution.
“Well-presented information, assignments clearly tied to work, and lots of opportunities for participation.”
No courses match that search. Try a broader term or clear the filters. Our programs also evolve with partners, so tell us what you’re looking for.
Your pathway
Shown in a suggested order. Our team will adjust the sequence and depth with you.
How it works
We don’t start with a generic course and hope it fits. Engagements range from a single two-hour workshop to multi-year initiatives, and each one is shaped around your audience, tools, and priorities.
We start with your organization’s goals, roles, skill gaps, priorities, and learning constraints.
We map course progressions to your business priorities and workforce needs.
Examples, scenarios, and exercises are tailored to your roles, industry, and constraints, using the tools your team already has.
Sessions are scheduled around your team’s capacity, with time for practice, discussion, and questions.
Participant feedback informs future training, expansion, or follow-on support.
Inside a session
AI tools can generate examples for any role on demand. What they can’t do is talk through the gray areas with your team: when an answer is good enough, when it needs a closer look, and where AI fits in the way a department already works.
Enough understanding of how the tool works that people still know what to do when features move or the interface changes.
Experts show how it applies to work in your function, with scenarios built around your team’s roles.
Learners work hands-on with a role-relevant document or a pre-built project, in the tools your team already uses.
Learners compare what worked and trade ideas for where else it applies. Experts close with the takeaways that still hold when the tool changes, so the learning keeps going after the session ends.
Live virtual sessions put every learner hands-on at their own keyboard, with no travel for your team. In-person and hybrid sessions are available too.
In a recent cohort, post-training confidence reached 83%–97% across measured AI skill areas, including RAG, AI agents, system prompts, LLM memory, and personalization settings.
Based on learners who completed both the pre-survey and post-survey. Pre-training confidence ranged from 0%–41%.
Training comparison
Most training options now offer role-relevant examples and hands-on exercises. The difference is live discussion with experts, skills that carry over when tools change, and a path to what your organization does next.
| What to compare | Northeastern Custom Learning | Self-paced online courses | Generalist training vendors | No Training Support Provided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decide how AI fits your work | ✓ Teams work out which tasks to hand to AI and which to keep | ◐ Tool features and suggested uses | ◐ Varies by vendor | – Left to individuals |
| Skills that transfer across tools | ✓ Built around your roles and context, taught in the tools you use | ◐ Often tied to one tool’s features | ◐ Sometimes | – Trial and error |
| Live discussion with experts | ✓ Questions, nuance, and edge cases worked through in real time | – Automated or none | ◐ Varies by instructor | – Not available |
| Judge AI output | ✓ Where AI falls short and when to check its output | ◐ Covered as a concept | ◐ Covered as a concept | – Errors found after the fact |
| Shared team practice | ✓ Colleagues learn together and compare approaches | – Individual learning | ◐ Sometimes | – Inconsistent across teams |
| A path past training | ✓ Connects to talent, applied AI, and responsible AI support | – Ends at the course | ◐ Sometimes connected | – Not applicable |
Exploring AI, data, or technology training for your organization? Tell us where you are, and we’ll connect you with the right person.

Talk through your goals, the teams you want to reach, and where AI fits. Nicole will help you find the right starting point.
Map out courses, customization, and scheduling for the teams you want to train. Pick a time, and you’ll meet with Colleen or Lauren.
Your pathway is copied when you click. Paste it into the booking question.
Already working with someone on our team? Book directly with Colleen, Lauren, or Nicole.
Berkeley Almand-Hunter, Dan Koloski, and Zach Blattner shape our custom learning programs and teaching approach, and helped build the two frameworks our team uses with partners to set AI priorities and plan upskilling.
AI adoption, data literacy, and responsible use
Helps teams understand how AI and data tools can support real workflows, better decisions, and practical adoption.
View profile
Workforce transformation, AI strategy, and intrapreneurship
Helps organizations build AI and data capability from within by connecting learning, innovation, and workforce strategy.
View profile
Learning design, facilitation, and enterprise AI upskilling
Leads AI upskilling for financial, legal, and professional services organizations, including the multi-year Bangor Savings Bank program, using practice-based, role-focused training.
View profileEvaluate AI opportunities through strategic questions, moving from reactive experimentation to clearer value delivery.
Explore the framework →Map current skills against future needs and identify targeted upskilling recommendations by role.
Explore the framework →Both frameworks were developed with Berkeley, Dan, and Zach.
Northeastern brings workforce learning, graduate talent, applied AI, and research together. As your needs develop, we can help you move from building capability to governance, use-case development, prototyping, implementation, or custom research.
Don’t see your question? Talk with our team.
For Maine employers, often yes. The Roux Institute is an accredited training provider for the Harold Alfond Center Workforce Development Grant, a 50/50 match of up to $1,200 per eligible worker, and for the Dirigo Business Incentives program for qualifying for-profit companies. See funding details
Courses run from 1.5-hour workshops to 12-hour programs, depending on the topic, audience, and how much applied work is needed. Each course in the pathway builder lists its time range.
Many virtual classes can run as cohorts of up to 50 learners, though smaller groups may be recommended depending on the content and goals.
Courses support employees from frontline staff to executives, including technical, non-technical, functional, and leadership audiences.
Reach out to the custom learning team. Programs can be shaped around your organization’s specific needs, roles, tools, and priorities.
Many learning experiences include a digital badge that learners can share as a visual micro-credential.
Start with a short conversation about your team, goals, and learning needs. Maine employers can often offset part of the cost through Maine workforce funding programs.
Responsible AI Education
Responsible AI is not only a policy conversation. It requires shared language, practical decision-making, governance structures, and role-specific training for the people building, buying, managing, and using AI systems.
Northeastern’s Responsible AI education helps organizations move beyond high-level principles and build the skills, structures, and practices needed to manage AI responsibly.
Explore Responsible AI PracticeBuild shared understanding of AI risk, oversight, accountability, and governance so leaders can make better adoption decisions.
Help teams translate Responsible AI principles into workflows, review processes, deployment gates, and evidence-based decision-making.
Train teams to identify, evaluate, and document risks related to fairness, robustness, explainability, privacy, safety, and intended use.
Support employees using generative AI with practical guidance around privacy, accuracy, human oversight, bias, and appropriate use.
Responsible AI education can be delivered as stand-alone training or paired with broader AI strategy, governance, workforce development, or applied AI initiatives.

This course equips leaders with an actionable blueprint to drive RAI strategy and advance their businesses in the digital age. Ideal for those leading company strategy, digital transformation, or innovation initiatives.
View Course
Explore the ethical and technical foundations of generative AI and learn best practices for its responsible integration. Ideal for individuals seeking to navigate AI development and deployment responsibly.
View Course